Píšete publikaci? Pak nezapomeňte navštívit:
http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2288/3/25
Vaše publikace bude nejspíše hodnocena pomocí tzv. QUADAS formuláře, viz níže. Splněním požadovaných kritérií se vyhnete zklamání v podobě vrácení Vaší práce zpět či odmítnutí.
The QUADAS tool
|
Item
|
|
Yes
|
No
|
Unclear
|
|
|
|
|
1.
|
Was the spectrum of patients representative of the patients who will receive the test in practice?
|
( )
|
( )
|
( )
|
2.
|
Were selection criteria clearly described?
|
( )
|
( )
|
( )
|
3.
|
Is the reference standard likely to correctly classify the target condition?
|
( )
|
( )
|
( )
|
4.
|
Is the time period between reference standard and index test short enough to be reasonably sure that the target condition did not change between the two tests?
|
( )
|
( )
|
( )
|
5.
|
Did the whole sample or a random selection of the sample, receive verification using a reference standard of diagnosis?
|
( )
|
( )
|
( )
|
6.
|
Did patients receive the same reference standard regardless of the index test result?
|
( )
|
( )
|
( )
|
7.
|
Was the reference standard independent of the index test (i.e. the index test did not form part of the reference standard)?
|
( )
|
( )
|
( )
|
8.
|
Was the execution of the index test described in sufficient detail to permit replication of the test?
|
( )
|
( )
|
( )
|
9.
|
Was the execution of the reference standard described in sufficient detail to permit its replication?
|
( )
|
( )
|
( )
|
10.
|
Were the index test results interpreted without knowledge of the results of the reference standard?
|
( )
|
( )
|
( )
|
11.
|
Were the reference standard results interpreted without knowledge of the results of the index test?
|
( )
|
( )
|
( )
|
12.
|
Were the same clinical data available when test results were interpreted as would be available when the test is used in practice?
|
( )
|
( )
|
( )
|
13.
|
Were uninterpretable/ intermediate test results reported?
|
( )
|
( )
|
( )
|
14.
|
Were withdrawals from the study explained?
|
( )
|
( )
|
( )
|
|
Whiting et al. BMC Medical Research Methodology 2003 3:25 doi:10.1186/1471-2288-3-25
|
-gyns-